![]() In fact, the film's murky visuals often lead to color banding and minor posterization in some scenes – not because the encode is lacking, but the film's foggy visuals remove depth and detail. While the encode itself is fairly flawless, the look of the film simply doesn't translate well to high-def. The movie itself receives a somewhat dull VC-1 transfer. But honestly, given how monstrously expensive these sets are, scrapping the last four and switching to a more conventional special edition might be the best option. ![]() The inside flap on the case even suggests this might happen as Potter documentaries 5-8 are now "tentatively scheduled," which is far less definitive than previous press releases suggested. is going to scrap the box sets for the final four films and restart from scratch in a new direction. Frankly, I'm concerned that if this latest helping of ultimate editions doesn't sell well, Warner Bros. ![]() Also different is the box, which features a lenticular cover and a slightly altered, less appealing design. But, due to director interference, or the more standard (and annoying) budgetary issues, that bonus feature has been dropped from Potter 3-4. The original press release for this series claimed that each film would receive extended cuts, as well as the original theatrical cut. This latest Blu-ray "Ultimate Edition" is an elite member of a multi-part rollout of all eight Potter films. The cast gives it all they've got, but the film feels like it's on autopilot. While it's true, Goblet of Fire is an enjoyable Potter film, with a knockout final act, it's also one of the weaker entries in the series, taking us back to the cumbersome tone and snail-like pacing of the first two films. And Roger Pratt's cinematography, which is filled with dreary grays and depressing cloudy skies, lacks the hypnotic look of year three (or previous years, for that matter). The story is still gripping, but the narrative lumbers along at times. The film simply isn't as daring or ingenious as the previous entry. But if you fell in love with what Cuaron did for the Potter world, then Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire will be a bit of a letdown. Rowling's book with far more accuracy (save for the trims to the overlong story, of course). If you hated what Cuaron brought to the table, you're likely to enjoy the fourth film much more as it follows J.K. How much one enjoyed Alfonso Cuaron's inventive third film will often (not always) translate to how much one enjoys the fourth, much technically safer, film. So naturally, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire is the best film in the series, too, right? Well, that's debatable.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |